|
研究生:
郭百修
學位類別:
碩士
校院名稱:
國立台北大學
學年度: 88
[摘要]
伴隨全球化的發展所造成的「文化普同性」，近年在地方意識興起的趨勢下，地方文化政策成為晚進各國空間發展與都市再生的重要議題。台灣在此潮流下，亦開始推動「社區總體營造」、「文化產業化、產業文化化」等運動。但由近十餘年的推動顯現，地方文化政策並未有效促使地方內生的發展，地方成員在推動過程中衝突不斷甚至越演越烈，而此一攸關地方空間發展的施行過程裡，空間規劃部門亦欠缺良好的介入機制與角色定位的調整，使相關地方文化政策對於地方發展的影響備受質疑。
本研究於此，以目前台灣地區初步具備地方自明性並且具有地方文化發展基礎的高雄縣美濃鎮為個案研究，從地方文化產業化角度切入，探討在地方文化產業化過程中地方成員的調節互動，並以相關事件與地方公共事務運作作為互動情形的分析，進而從社會調節與空間發展的方向，期望能建構美濃鎮地方文化產業化機制帶動地方內生式的發展。
本研究首先從目前地方文化發展政策以及國內外相關個案、當前地方發展理論中的調節理論瞭解，從中建構本研究的分析架構，作為研究往後的分析基礎。第二部份即由美濃鎮的個案切入，分為實質、非實質文化資源與地方社會互動調節機制分析，而主要即針對以「美濃水庫」事件後的地方共識與成員互動的情形，探討其在面對地方文化產業化過程中的相關現象與問題。第三部份則綜合前述對美濃鎮的分析，建構與擬議地方文化產業化過程與成員構成、社會調節機制的形塑、地方文化產業化的空間發展，並於最後由上述研究成果對當前地方文化政策提出相關課題與意涵，提供為未來推動地方文化產業化機制形塑的參考。
本研究的結果，主要有以下結論：
1.地方文化產業化機制最重要的即是地方成員間互信機制的建立，而此一信任機制即是目前在推動文化發展與社區營造所必須建立的。
2.地方發展與文化延續的運作是需要由地方居民動員而起，亦即強調地方內生與自發動員的文化與生活積累。
3.空間規劃部門在地方文化產業化過程中，以促使地方成員對發展規劃的參與及認同感的建立，並且塑造良好的環境促進地方社會互動，所扮演的是極為重要的催化與協助者的角色。特別是在地方發展構想塑造部份，更是未來地方文化產業化，社會機制建構的物質基礎。
總結而言，未來在推動與探討地方文化延續與地方發展的過程裡，應在以強調實質文化資源與非實質文化資源的建構之外，更進一步探討地方成員互動情形，促使其社會的互動調節機制形成，作為地方文化與地方發展的內生基礎。
As culture
globalization and development of localism, local culture policy has
been an important issue in spatial development and urban renewal in
every country. In the trend, Taiwan also launchs policies such as the
“Community development project”, “Cultural Industrilization” and
“Industrial Culturialization” etc. But in recent decade, local culture
policies within locality did not promote local development
endogenously and properly. Local contradiction and conflict is getting
stronger in the process, but spatial planning sector lacks good
mechanism and role to inter this process of local development. It is
questioning local effects of culture policy on local development.
Case study of this research is Mei-nung town in
south Taiwan. In order to understand the local culture
industrilization mechanism, social regulation, the interaction of
local members, the interactive analysis of some events and public
affairs, and spatial development are explored. The research is divided
into four parts.
First, this research investigates the policy of
local culture development, the related cases and “Regulation Theory”
to build the analysis framework. The second part explores local social
interaction, physical and non-physical cultural resources. It mainly
discusses the related phenomenon and issues within the local culture
industrilization process with preference to local consensus and
members’ interaction after “Mei-nung Reservoir” event. The third part
focuses on the local culture industrilization process, the major
actors, the social regulation mechanism and the spatial development of
local culture industrilization. By the end, this research offers
several policy implications for Taiwan’s local culture policy.
The research
reaches following conclusions:
1.Constructing
local institution is the most important issue in local culture
industrilization mechanism. It is necessary to establish the trust
mechanism in combining culture development and community management.
2.It needs
mobilize local resident for local development and cultural continuty.
Through emphasizing endogenous accumulation on culture and lives of
local development.
3.During the
local cultural industrilization process, spatial planning sector has
an important role to play in assisting, local actors developing
participation and identification. Especially, it also serves as an
important material basis for local cultural industrilization and
social mechanism formation. |
